Michigan Rejects Expanded Energy Mandate

Michigan voters rejected a proposed state constitutional amendment last week that would have imposed a mandate requiring the state?s utilities to source 25 percent of their electric sales annually from renewable energy by 2025.

Proposal 3, dubbed ?25 by 25,? called for more renewable energy from wind, solar, biomass, and hydropower, while setting price caps to control expected rate increases caused by compliance with the new standard.

The amendment would have exceeded current renewable energy standards imposed by the state. Michigan currently seeks to reach 10 percent renewable energy by 2015, due to a law passed in 2008.

The overwhelming defeat came despite millions from an out-of-state ballot committee Michigan Energy Michigan Jobs (MEMJ) that was opposed by in-state utilities, as Scribe?s Lachlan Markay wrote in the Washington Examiner:

Of the $11.1 million MEMJ has collected in 2012, about 85 percent has come from major environmental advocacy groups, including, in order of magnitude, the League of Conservation Voters, the Green Tech Action Fund, the BlueGreen Alliance, the American Wind Energy Association, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Environmental Law and Policy Center, the Environmental Defense Action Fund, the Regeneration Project and the Union of Concerned Scientists. The only individual donor to give MEMJ more than $1,000 is millionaireNew Yorkhedge fund manager Julian Robertson, who gave $1 million?

Michiganutilities DTE Energy and CMS Energy (directly and through subsidiary Consumers Energy) are providing about 95 percent of the $25 million in funding on the other side, through a ballot committee called the Clean Affordable Renewable Energy for Michigan Coalition.

Regardless of the massive one-time expense by both parties, the mandate?s continuing expense on individuals and businesses was a key reason Michiganders turned Prop 3 down 63 percent to 37 percent.

The Heritage Foundation?s Katie Tubb examined some of the impending costs of the amendment?s passage, which aside from being rash energy policy functions as a giant energy tax:

Nearly every service and product depends on electricity and when prices go up it affects the entire economy. Though the magnitude of net economic impacts differ [across studies], the direction is clear: mandating specific energy sources, rather than introducing efficiency, slows the economy. Electricity prices go up, incomes and employment go down, and the effects of a mandate escalate as the milestones built into the mandate become steeper. As it is,Michigan has over 70 percent of their current mandate to accomplish and yet prices continue to climb. Mandating renewable energy is in effect mandating higher costs and market inefficiency.

While environmentalists from around the United States hoped Michigan could be the vanguard for a broader national renewable energy policy, Michiganders sent the message loud and clear that costs and benefits matter. America should take notice.

Source: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/11/14/michigans-rejection-of-renewable-energy-mandate-avoids-higher-costs/

kansas jayhawks mega millions results louisville lotto numbers susan powell megamillions winners university of louisville